Nakka Manasa.et.al / REST Journal on Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence, 1(3) 2022, 36-41
Copyright@ REST Publisher 41
Reliable : Consistently good at performance, and trusted by researchers.
Adaptive : The human mind should improve its ability.
Self-learning : Greater memory could be increased via brain chips.
Contextual : Brain chips may indeed be beneficial under certain scenarios.
Personalized : Can indeed be created to satisfy the demands of the individual.
Productivity : Extremely effective in enhancing mental function in individuals.
Security : Human memory can indeed be maintained via brain chips without loss of memory.
8. Risks Associated with Brain-Computer Interface
The Brain Chip Interface technology, which is directly connected to the human brain, may cause harm to its users if im-
properly used. Some of the possible dangers connected to BCI are
Results that are inaccurate: Our brain is an extremely complicated organism. We occasionally find ourselves unable to
comprehend what is occurring in our thinking. Therefore, it is unreasonable to expect a man-made Brain Chip Interface to
accurately translate every signal from our brains. The user's intentions may occasionally be misinterpreted by the Brain Chip
Interface. For instance, the Brain Chip Interface might incorrectly identify a disabled individual using a prosthetic device who
wishes to raise his index finger, causing the middle finger to lift instead.
The large size of the network: A Brain Chip Monitoring program will potentially lead to a very terrible customer experi-
ence since it needs an installation of various cables since the brain and machine should be linked. As a consequence, one of the
major flaws of a Brain Chip Control surface will be its large structure which would force that person under tremendous physical
and psychological stress due to the massive cabling needed.
Insufficient security: People expect confidentiality to become a vital requirement when people acquire and enroll in such
technological goods and services. In reality, confidentiality for personal information cannot be assured using the Brain Chips
Technologies that have emerged. Digital allows it easy for any individual to analyze what’s really occurring within one’s mind
but also steal personal security.
9. Brain Chips' Disadvantages
• Due to the greater cost, it’s really hard to afford.
• Surgical Risk 10. Conclusion
The expansion of brain chip engineering methodology is a great boost for sick people suffering from neurological illnesses;
there has been a breakthrough within technology, as well as neuroscience. Interaction via brain-based neural activity can be
feasible as a result of brain chip technology. The outcomes are astoundingly fantastic and incredible. The benefit of brain chips
using nanotechnology allows researchers to develop fewer but also improved processors, enabling brain chip technology less
burdensome but more reliable possibility to individuals. Better productive in restoring limb function as assisting patient’s
proper treatment. Eventually, it offers incredible, limitless benefits.
References
[1]. W.L. Rutten, Annu. Rev. Biomed.eng. 4 (2002) 407–452.
[2]. P. Fromherz, Neuroelectronic Interfacing: Semiconductor chips with Ion Channels, Nerve cells, and Brain, inR.
Waser (Ed.)
[3]. Nanoelectronics and Information Technology, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2003, pp. 781– 810.
[4]. K.D. Wise, D.J. Anderson, J.F. Hetke, D.R. Kipke, K. Najafi, Proc. IEEE (2004) 76–97.
[5]. M.A. Lebedev, M.A.L. Nicolelis, Trends Neurosci. (2007) 537– 546.
[6]. L.R. Hochberg, et al., Nature 42 (2006) 256–270.
[7]. S.M. Potter, D.A. Wagenaar, T. DeMarse, Closing the loop: stimulation feedback systems for embodied MEA
cultures, in: M. Taketani, M.
[8]. Baudry (Eds.), Advances in Network Electrophysiology Using Multi-Electrodes-Arrays, Springer, 2005.
[9]. S. Vassanelli, P. Fromherz, Appl. Phys. A 66 (1998) 459–463.
[10]. Hai, J. Shappir, E. Spira, J. Neurophysiol. 104 (2010) 559– 568.
[11]. Lambacher, et al., Appl. Phys. A 79 (2004) 1607–1611.
[12]. William D. Penny, Stephen J. Roberts, “EEG-based communication: A pattern recognition approach,” IEEE
Trans. Rehab. Eng., vol. 8, pp. 214–215, June 2000.
[13]. Jonathan. R. Wolpaw, “Brain-computer interface technology: A review of the first international meeting,” IEEE
Trans. on Rehab. Eng 2000; 8:164–173.
[14]. KeshviChauhan, “Implementation of Brain-Computer Interface,” International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) Vol. 1, Issue 3, pp.807-812
[15]. Luca Citi, “Defining brain-machine interface application by matching interface performance with device require-
ments” Journal of Neuroscience Methods,167 (2008) 91–104.